Yeah, I’m forking out $600+ for that first pair. When I first read the description of those I thought it said “bondage bottie”. That’s my new name for them.
I can’t help it I’m a shoe junkie. If my knees could handle it, I would wear the Jessica Simpson ones. But alas, something lower with lots of punch & style would be right up my alley.
@Debby: I love the term bondage bootie! I think that’s my name for them now, too. 🙂
Not one of these look remotely comfortable. If I had to sit somewhere and just look pretty – then, well, maybe.
But mostly, I have to find something that I can actually walk around in and not look like someone who hasn’t yet grasped the art of gross motor skills.
🙂
I’m in love love love with the first pair for nearly 700 bucks, and the metallicey steve maddin pair (the last ones). Clearly for nights out when you won’t be standing for more than 3 hours. I don’t care though – being gorgeous is sometimes like being caged like hannibal.
I have the Steve Madden Maxi’s. I wear them to work with a long black pencil skirt and get so many compliments on them. They really are pretty comfortable. I usually wear them on days when I don’t have to do too much walking around. They make me taller than my husband!
I’ve been wondering who on earth wears the 4″ heels that always seem to be in the Endless ad emails. I don’t know anyone who could walk in them. I love the look of some of those – if they were 2″ instead of 4″, perhaps.
this is a test, right? like, of my committment to the the poverty party? really, is it a test? because those pelle modas, dear god, yes, i would wear them to the grocery store, i would wear them to the PTA, i would wear them in my house, i would wear them with a mouse, i would wear them here and there, and i would wear them EVERYWHERE. poverty, schmoverty.
aside from the obvious height issues after 2 knee replacements, I would wear any of them anywhere. and, kate, the things that put us in poverty are usually the things that make life worth living, don’t you think? amen to poverty schmoverty!
Here’s where I am on $600 shooz – I just shelled out $9 at Bed Bath & Beyond (discount health & beauty anyone?) for a DIY highlight kit (twice – not highlighty enough the first time), for highlights that I will color over in about 3 weeks. Then I basked in my extravagance while declaring – as gawd is mah witness, ah will nevuh be hungry AGAIN!
1 – having a strap or cage over the top of the foot makes the legs look shorter. i have long legs and don’t want to divert attention from them by cutting off my legs.
2 – i can’t wear them b/c my arches are too high. same reason i can’t wear many boots and t-strap shoes.
What are you all ON about? I wear the Luichiny pair all the time while I do the wash. Uber-comfortable and they make it so easy to reach the laundry soap on the top shelf. Gosh, some people just don’t know how to enjoy life!
Oh goodness, I lie. I’m groaning in pain just thinking about these. Sad sad sad. Cuz I do love shoes. But knee replacements? Here I come.
And I didn’t ever even WEAR this stuff! My knees hurt back when I was just 17. *sob*
OhmygoodLordinHEAVEN! Those are so very truly awful. I’d go into labour if I walked across the room in those things. Mostly because I’d fall and break myself, and have some sort of medical emergency. Not good.
I think they’re cute. I wouldn’t wear them with skirts/dresses because I have short legs and that footing would totally cut off the visual line. Also, they don’t wear well on the sand. In summary: cute, yes, but not for me.
I have to be honest, there are several pairs that I love–at least in theory. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that if I purchased any, they’d sit in my closet next to all those other beautiful-but-terribly-painful-after-three-minutes pairs of shoes I own and never wear (and have very little occasion to wear.) Sigh.
Here I am, trying to be good with the poverty party, and then along comes a page of BEAUTIFUL shoes! This is just cruel, like your husband taking pictures of cute puppies you can’t have.
I’ll take the Steve Madden ‘Maxis’ in size 71/2, please!
I’m not the Liz who thinks these shoes are great. I’m the Liz who has three kids and can’t imagine how I would chase them around the house in 600 dollar shoes that look midieval.
Oh I LOVE em all… on someone else. You need 18 year-old knees and real purty feet to get away with those “bondage booties”… or was it “bondage botties”…
Gwyneth can get away with ’em too. But I feel for her knees in about 5 years!
OK, those totally look like they’re some sort of medically necessary footwear. Or like maybe those way-too-skinny hollywood types haven’t figured out that someone’s making them look like life-sized Bratz dolls? Is big hair back in fashion? Or is that next?
I believe Bossy would be 7 ft tall in those shoes. The only way THIS girl would wear those is if I got to sit the entire time. And I would also put bags over my feet. They are fugly.
These have to be the ugliest shoes ever. One couldn’t even wear them and sit and look pretty as one would be wearing them and sitting and looking ugly.
they’re designed by a man who’s directly descended from the grand inquisitor of the spanish inquistion. it’s the same lineage from whence came corsets, girdles and control top pantyhose. i not only would not pay for them, i feel somewhat robbed of my usual bossy moment.
Eghads! I am with all the women who see these as instruments of torture and appropriate only for street corners – – if there is a chair there!
I get complete foot claustrophobia if I am strapped into a pair of shoes. Can’t kick them off under my desk!
I am saving lots of money by not buying these.
Well said Bossy! I LOVE fashion and I usually favor a different look, however, these have to be the ugliest trend in shoes I have ever seen! They are going out as fast as they came in…………….ICKY, ICKY POO-POO!
THANK YOU! God those are so ugly…I can’t believe they’re in style right now! I can’t wait until they’re outta here…thankfully, I don’t have any friends/family who own a pair. Hopefully it will stay that way…or else a year from now (hopefully less), I’ll have to say…told ya so!
Of COURSE Kate has been here already and said just what I was going to say! I paid off my credit card not too long ago and now it’s whispering my name, “Mel, you can buy more than one pair. The interest rate is still low!” Bossy plays dirty.
Debby says
October 29, 2008 at 9:29 amYeah, I’m forking out $600+ for that first pair. When I first read the description of those I thought it said “bondage bottie”. That’s my new name for them.
Robin says
October 29, 2008 at 9:34 amI can’t help it I’m a shoe junkie. If my knees could handle it, I would wear the Jessica Simpson ones. But alas, something lower with lots of punch & style would be right up my alley.
justjuli says
October 29, 2008 at 9:39 am@Debby: I love the term bondage bootie! I think that’s my name for them now, too. 🙂
Not one of these look remotely comfortable. If I had to sit somewhere and just look pretty – then, well, maybe.
But mostly, I have to find something that I can actually walk around in and not look like someone who hasn’t yet grasped the art of gross motor skills.
🙂
junebug says
October 29, 2008 at 9:40 amI have a pair of sandals that look just like the Jessica Simpson pair. Mine are Gianni Bini from Dillard’s and about 1 inch shorter. Very wearable.
corrie says
October 29, 2008 at 9:40 amI don’t know… looks like something that the inventor of pole dancing thought up…sexy to the point of raunch.
junebug says
October 29, 2008 at 9:42 amI like the “free overnight” option. I’ll take those Dolce Vita’s for “free.” 😀
pam says
October 29, 2008 at 9:44 amI think they’re pretty cool looking. I assume they’re simply for standing. There’s no way you could actually walk in them right?
Margaret says
October 29, 2008 at 9:47 amWhere would I wear such shoes? The grocery store? PTA Meetings? Walking the dog?
Renee says
October 29, 2008 at 9:48 amI’m in love love love with the first pair for nearly 700 bucks, and the metallicey steve maddin pair (the last ones). Clearly for nights out when you won’t be standing for more than 3 hours. I don’t care though – being gorgeous is sometimes like being caged like hannibal.
Tammy says
October 29, 2008 at 9:51 amHere in the heartland, those just don’t make sense. We’re slaves to COMFORT out here, not to fashion.
caleal says
October 29, 2008 at 9:54 amThis is Caleal’s: Ew.
shelley says
October 29, 2008 at 9:54 amLOVE the Jessica Simpson ones – except, is that a zipper on it? wtf? Don’t like the look of the rest of ’em.
love the randomness of your posts 🙂
Heather says
October 29, 2008 at 9:57 amDressing feet one street corner at a time.
Little Miss Sunshine State says
October 29, 2008 at 10:03 amI would fall down. If that didn’t kill me, my foot surgeon would!
heather says
October 29, 2008 at 10:03 amHow do you put them on?? Especially the Luichiny ones? Do you need a dress maid, like women had in ye olden days to help them tighten corsets?
Jujupiter says
October 29, 2008 at 10:06 amIt’s crazy all these expensive accessories they create for mobile phones.
LeahBear says
October 29, 2008 at 10:06 amOw, ow, ow, ow, ow, and ow.
Asthmagirl says
October 29, 2008 at 10:10 amI’m more about the comfort than the fashion anymore. However, I don’t think I’ll ever be about $600 shoes no matter how cute they are.
jenn says
October 29, 2008 at 10:12 amI can feel my toes going numb just looking at them. . . who says foot binding is a dead art?
jenny in MN says
October 29, 2008 at 10:28 amha ha ha… wonder if you have strap marks all over your feet when u take them off. Now THAT’S sexy!
Jacquie says
October 29, 2008 at 10:28 amOnly if I get to carry a whip
ruthwells says
October 29, 2008 at 10:37 amWho the hell pays that kind of money for shoes?!
Yellaphant says
October 29, 2008 at 10:40 amThis is Bridget’s: I just threw up a little in my mouth
jan8mr.lootiato says
October 29, 2008 at 10:45 amyou guys are mixed up.
these are to wear to bed when you have carpel tunnel feet.
davido says
October 29, 2008 at 10:50 amObviously, shoes to wear in bed. Um yeah.
The Domestic Goddess says
October 29, 2008 at 10:52 amHere’s my opinion: OUCH.
Lisa says
October 29, 2008 at 11:06 amI have the Steve Madden Maxi’s. I wear them to work with a long black pencil skirt and get so many compliments on them. They really are pretty comfortable. I usually wear them on days when I don’t have to do too much walking around. They make me taller than my husband!
so NOT cool says
October 29, 2008 at 11:10 amLooking at these shoes … To hell with it, I’ll be a masochist. Most of them are gorgeous.
And, if someone tries to mug me, I’ll go all sadistic on their ass with my shoes … you know, to keep things balanced.
Betsey says
October 29, 2008 at 11:12 amI’ve been wondering who on earth wears the 4″ heels that always seem to be in the Endless ad emails. I don’t know anyone who could walk in them. I love the look of some of those – if they were 2″ instead of 4″, perhaps.
Stacey Ball says
October 29, 2008 at 11:12 amThere are some that I like, but I feel like if I put them on I would also have to be wearing a lot of pleather and go by Mistress Stacey!
Amanda says
October 29, 2008 at 11:12 amI guess I’m officially old because I find them all hideous and they look like torture devices.
JennC says
October 29, 2008 at 11:14 amCute. Do they make them in 11 wide?
Didn’t think so. I’ll stick with my Crocs.
kate says
October 29, 2008 at 11:25 amdear BOSSY,
this is a test, right? like, of my committment to the the poverty party? really, is it a test? because those pelle modas, dear god, yes, i would wear them to the grocery store, i would wear them to the PTA, i would wear them in my house, i would wear them with a mouse, i would wear them here and there, and i would wear them EVERYWHERE. poverty, schmoverty.
this is just mean, BOSSY.
yours in poverty,
kate
krg says
October 29, 2008 at 11:39 amaside from the obvious height issues after 2 knee replacements, I would wear any of them anywhere. and, kate, the things that put us in poverty are usually the things that make life worth living, don’t you think? amen to poverty schmoverty!
The Other Lisa says
October 29, 2008 at 11:40 amHere’s where I am on $600 shooz – I just shelled out $9 at Bed Bath & Beyond (discount health & beauty anyone?) for a DIY highlight kit (twice – not highlighty enough the first time), for highlights that I will color over in about 3 weeks. Then I basked in my extravagance while declaring – as gawd is mah witness, ah will nevuh be hungry AGAIN!
Jami says
October 29, 2008 at 11:45 amWTF is up with “Free Overnight”? They can spend the night for free? They’re free if you wear them overnight? They will be set free tomorrow?
I like “Bondage Booties” too! Off now to see if they sell matching opera-length fingerless gloves…
Linda says
October 29, 2008 at 11:47 amYou know a man had to invent these torture chambers!
jp says
October 29, 2008 at 11:58 amU.G.L.Y………………..seriously!
annie says
October 29, 2008 at 12:01 pmI think they’re adorable. they look a tad better than stillettos with basically two threads to hold them on.
Nancy says
October 29, 2008 at 12:08 pmCouple pair there I wouldn’t mind having.
Couple I would.
MamaMo says
October 29, 2008 at 12:12 pmApparently, I put the “fuddy” and the “duddy” in “fuddy duddy”. I just don’t get “fashion” most times.
Stephanie says
October 29, 2008 at 12:18 pmUm, I think those shoes belong in a Saw movie.
I’ll take my sneakers any day of the week, thank you very much.
All Adither says
October 29, 2008 at 12:39 pmAll I can say is… Six-foot-seven.
Susan says
October 29, 2008 at 12:40 pmI don’t care for that style AT ALL.
mommymae says
October 29, 2008 at 12:42 pm2 reasons i don’t like these:
1 – having a strap or cage over the top of the foot makes the legs look shorter. i have long legs and don’t want to divert attention from them by cutting off my legs.
2 – i can’t wear them b/c my arches are too high. same reason i can’t wear many boots and t-strap shoes.
oh yea and there’s a third reason…
they’re ugly
expateek says
October 29, 2008 at 12:44 pmWhat are you all ON about? I wear the Luichiny pair all the time while I do the wash. Uber-comfortable and they make it so easy to reach the laundry soap on the top shelf. Gosh, some people just don’t know how to enjoy life!
Oh goodness, I lie. I’m groaning in pain just thinking about these. Sad sad sad. Cuz I do love shoes. But knee replacements? Here I come.
And I didn’t ever even WEAR this stuff! My knees hurt back when I was just 17. *sob*
Assertagirl says
October 29, 2008 at 12:48 pmThey look like torture devices!
Cactus Petunia says
October 29, 2008 at 12:57 pmBondage Barbie called. She wants her shoes back, pronto.
RD says
October 29, 2008 at 1:09 pmI wonder if Birkenstock makes any of these.
ritabby says
October 29, 2008 at 1:22 pmQuite possibly the uggliest things to happen to women’s feet since hammer toes.
anne marie in philly says
October 29, 2008 at 1:44 pmyou could get several pairs of birkenstocks for that kind of money. AND the birkies are better for your feet!
most likely MEN invented these for women; these things are not even attractive! and just imagine the foot doctor bills…
nope, no sir, I don’t like it!
Pamela from the dayton time says
October 29, 2008 at 1:59 pmOhmygoodLordinHEAVEN! Those are so very truly awful. I’d go into labour if I walked across the room in those things. Mostly because I’d fall and break myself, and have some sort of medical emergency. Not good.
Surcie says
October 29, 2008 at 2:20 pmTo me, they scream PLANTAR FASCIITIS. I’ll stick with my comfy-yet-supportive Dansko clogs.
dgm says
October 29, 2008 at 2:38 pmI think they’re cute. I wouldn’t wear them with skirts/dresses because I have short legs and that footing would totally cut off the visual line. Also, they don’t wear well on the sand. In summary: cute, yes, but not for me.
Angie Atkinson says
October 29, 2008 at 2:38 pmI have to be honest, there are several pairs that I love–at least in theory. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that if I purchased any, they’d sit in my closet next to all those other beautiful-but-terribly-painful-after-three-minutes pairs of shoes I own and never wear (and have very little occasion to wear.) Sigh.
annie says
October 29, 2008 at 2:45 pmwhy would anybody fork out this much cash for such ugly – and Chinese-torture-looking – shoes?
crazylovescompany says
October 29, 2008 at 2:48 pmThere’s something very “Tina Turner in Mad Max- Beyond the Thunderdome” about these shoes.
jill says
October 29, 2008 at 4:04 pmare these supposed to be “sexy”? If so, I totally don’t get it. Then again, I wear flip flops 10 months out of the year.
Mama Bear says
October 29, 2008 at 4:10 pmAre the Jessica Simpsons supposed to help you look like her or are you supposed to use them against her?
Leaf, probably says
October 29, 2008 at 4:13 pmWhoa. My ankles would never survive.
Lo says
October 29, 2008 at 4:37 pmNice but not in my budget….
Tara R. says
October 29, 2008 at 4:45 pm$196 !!!!!!
Never. NEVER would I pay that much money for something that would cause me so much pain.
Plus I would look like a complete moron in those evil contraptions… I can see the headlines now…
“pigeon toed overweight woman found dead at bottom of driveway… police suspect shoes were involved”
Liz says
October 29, 2008 at 5:08 pmHere I am, trying to be good with the poverty party, and then along comes a page of BEAUTIFUL shoes! This is just cruel, like your husband taking pictures of cute puppies you can’t have.
I’ll take the Steve Madden ‘Maxis’ in size 71/2, please!
Liz says
October 29, 2008 at 6:01 pmThat ain’t right.
Liz- the other one says
October 29, 2008 at 6:05 pmI’m not the Liz who thinks these shoes are great. I’m the Liz who has three kids and can’t imagine how I would chase them around the house in 600 dollar shoes that look midieval.
BTW, I wear 71/2 shoes, too. Word.
Chesapeake Bay Woman says
October 29, 2008 at 7:14 pmBondage booties wins.
Those shoes (and heels) were definitely NOT made for walkin’.
Bush Babe says
October 29, 2008 at 7:49 pmOh I LOVE em all… on someone else. You need 18 year-old knees and real purty feet to get away with those “bondage booties”… or was it “bondage botties”…
Gwyneth can get away with ’em too. But I feel for her knees in about 5 years!
🙂
BB
DolphynGyrl says
October 29, 2008 at 8:02 pmOK, those totally look like they’re some sort of medically necessary footwear. Or like maybe those way-too-skinny hollywood types haven’t figured out that someone’s making them look like life-sized Bratz dolls? Is big hair back in fashion? Or is that next?
Also: flipflops? YEAR ROUND.
Ree (the other one) says
October 29, 2008 at 8:13 pmI believe Bossy would be 7 ft tall in those shoes. The only way THIS girl would wear those is if I got to sit the entire time. And I would also put bags over my feet. They are fugly.
Of course, that’s just my opinion.
Helena says
October 29, 2008 at 8:36 pmThere so scary!
Janet says
October 29, 2008 at 10:23 pmThese have to be the ugliest shoes ever. One couldn’t even wear them and sit and look pretty as one would be wearing them and sitting and looking ugly.
Helen + ilana = Hi says
October 29, 2008 at 11:57 pmPerhaps y’all should join The Sisterhood
naomi says
October 30, 2008 at 12:22 amthey’re designed by a man who’s directly descended from the grand inquisitor of the spanish inquistion. it’s the same lineage from whence came corsets, girdles and control top pantyhose. i not only would not pay for them, i feel somewhat robbed of my usual bossy moment.
~annie says
October 30, 2008 at 9:14 amHate to break it to you, but Halloween is not until the 31st. Oh, wait! That’s where the “Free Overnight” comes in… Carry on!
p.j. says
October 30, 2008 at 10:24 amEghads! I am with all the women who see these as instruments of torture and appropriate only for street corners – – if there is a chair there!
I get complete foot claustrophobia if I am strapped into a pair of shoes. Can’t kick them off under my desk!
I am saving lots of money by not buying these.
Laura says
October 30, 2008 at 10:31 amWell said Bossy! I LOVE fashion and I usually favor a different look, however, these have to be the ugliest trend in shoes I have ever seen! They are going out as fast as they came in…………….ICKY, ICKY POO-POO!
Maggie says
October 30, 2008 at 8:01 pmTHANK YOU! God those are so ugly…I can’t believe they’re in style right now! I can’t wait until they’re outta here…thankfully, I don’t have any friends/family who own a pair. Hopefully it will stay that way…or else a year from now (hopefully less), I’ll have to say…told ya so!
Melanie @ MelADramatic Mommy says
October 30, 2008 at 10:41 pmOf COURSE Kate has been here already and said just what I was going to say! I paid off my credit card not too long ago and now it’s whispering my name, “Mel, you can buy more than one pair. The interest rate is still low!” Bossy plays dirty.
Rhea says
October 30, 2008 at 11:24 pmI have to admit, those do not appeal to me.
tj says
October 31, 2008 at 12:15 pm…(*giggle*snort*)…Good one Miss Bossy! Can’t top that one so I’ll let it be…lol… ;o)
…Blessings…
Helen E. H. Madden says
November 2, 2008 at 10:22 amCage heels, huh? I didn’t know my feet had escaped.